Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-202521

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Multimodal anaesthesia techniques includeregional anaesthesia in the form of paravertebral block andvarious anaesthetic drugs which acts on different sites of painpathway with different mechanism of action, results in goodquality of analgesia with minimal side effects. They improverecovery along with early mobilization and rehabilitationand early resumption. This technique lowers the level ofinflammatory cytokines. Due to this we aim to evaluate theeffects multimodal anaesthesia technique on level of IL-6inflammatory cytokines in breast carcinoma surgery.Material and Methods: Patients were randomized intofollowing three groups (n=30 in each group) using a computergenerated random number tables. Group I: paracetamol 10 mg/kg, Group II: paracetamol at 10 mg/kg and dexmedetomidine0.5μg/kg, Group III: paracetamol 10 mg/kg, dexmedetomidine0.5 μg/kg and paravertebral block with levobupivacaine.Fentany (2 μg/kg) with general anaesthesia were common inall three groups. Statistical Analysis: All the categorical datawas compared by using student “t” test, chi-square test andparametric data by analysis of variance (ANOVA).Results: Patients of group III was haemodynamically morestable as compared to group II and I. IL-6 level was 358.15, ingroup I, 354 in group II and 346.65 in group III preoperativelywhile 324.85 in group I, 320.95 in group II, 278.35 in group IIIafter 2 hour surgery. IL-6 level was significantly different ingroup III as compared to group II and group I postoperatively.Conclusion: Multimodal approach is a better anesthetictechnique in terms of hemodynamic stability with decreasedlevels of IL-6 inflammatory cytokines.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-211457

ABSTRACT

Background: Although, the concept of laparoscopic surgeries has revolutionised the surgical practice and has markedly reduced the incidence of complications especially postoperative pain. However, the menace of postoperative pain still remains challenge, especially in first 24 hours. The present study was conducted to comparatively analyse the postoperative pain and sedation using intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous esmolol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: Study was conducted on 90 adult patients aged 18-60 years of ASA grade I or II of both genders, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Patients of group A received esmolol infusion (loading: 1 mg/kg and maintenance: 5-15 µg/kg/min), patients of group B received dexmedetomidine infusion (loading: 0.7 µg/kg and maintenance: 0.4 µg/kg/hour) and group C (control group) received normal saline infusion. During the post-operative period of 24 hours, patient were monitored for sedation using Ramsay sedation score like pain, using visual analogue score (VAS), incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting and use of any drug for pain, vomiting and any other side effect.Results: Frequency of pain was highest in group C at all post periods, followed by group A and was least in group B. The mean sedation score of group B was comparatively higher as compared to both group C and group A.Conclusions: The inference authors drew was that dexmedetomidine is better analgesic with aurousable sedation.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL